Sweet Tooth

I wrote a long post about Sweet Tooth.

All about it being the typical novel of a much-published author – too tricksy for its own good, and proving a point rather than being the best book McEwan could write.

In truth the twisty tricksiness is at once the best and worst thing about it – it provides a peak of interest and excitement in an otherwise slightly boring read – but it’s because of the trick itself that McEwan has (purposely, we must imagine knowing his other work) made it a slightly boring read in the first place. My post wrangled back and forth over this paradox, but I’ll save you 600 words and come to the point: is it ever worth it, in fiction, to prioritise the message and theme over and above the reading experience? McEwan reckons yes. I disagree. If they don’t work in harmony, you should be using another medium, my friend (as I imagine myself saying to McEwan in a worldly-wise, kindly manner.)

There’s a place in this world for all kinds of fiction, and I appreciated Sweet Tooth’s twist and its implications as much as the next reader. But for my money McEwan pushed it too far.*

This curt post was brought to you courtesy of a bad Monday at work. Shortening posts since 2012.

* You should know that if I ever did meet McEwan, I’d probably simper and ask him to sign my face.

Advertisements

One thought on “Sweet Tooth

  1. Pingback: 2012: The Edit « Room of Joy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s